War Against the Wannabe Rich

Sunday Paper - December 27th, 2009

Why attack the productive classes who want to be rich?

There is class warfare going on in this country — but it’s not against the established rich. It’s against those who are trying to become wealthy.

President Obama has declared that those who make over $200,000 will pay higher income taxes. Caps on payroll taxes are supposed to come off as well for the upper class. Envisioned estate taxes will take 45 percent of individual inheritances valued over $3.5 million. Many states have also hiked their income taxes on the upper brackets.

Again, most of those targeted are not the already rich — a Warren Buffett or Bill Gates — but millions of the wannabe rich. They may have achieved larger-than-average annual incomes, but they’re not the multimillionaire speculators on Wall Street who nearly wrecked the American economy in search of huge bonuses and payoffs. Most are instead professionals and small-business owners who take enormous risks in hopes of being well-off and passing their wealth on to their children.

Oddly, much of the populist rhetoric about the need to gouge the newly affluent is voiced by the entrenched wealthy, who don’t have to care how high taxes go, given their own vast fortunes.

Take Bill Gates Sr., who is clamoring for higher estate taxes on inheritances. But such advocacy comes easy for him. After all, he is the father of the richest man in the world — someone who clearly needs no inheritance.

Billionaires also often set up charitable foundations to ensure their estates are channeled to their own preferences rather than simply given over to a needy U.S. Treasury. In contrast, moderately affluent business owners or farmers often leave enough property for their heirs to pay death taxes, but not enough to set up tax-exempt charitable foundations.

Warren Buffett also wants higher income taxes on the wealthy. He once confessed that thanks to all sorts of write-offs, he had paid only about 17 percent of his gross income in federal taxes, a lower rate than many employees in his office.

But Buffett, like Bill Gates Jr., is worth many billions of dollars. In truth, he has so much money that no amount of taxes would affect him much. A combined tax bite of 60 percent of his annual income would still leave Buffett each year with millions. Yet the same rate could cripple a business owner making $300,000 in annual income.

Often those in government claim that their tax-increase proposals are simply targeting the affluent like themselves — proof of their own selflessness. President Obama, for example, has complained that the well-off like himself could afford to pay more.

But unlike politicians in Washington, most upscale Americans in private enterprise do not receive free government perks and lavish pensions. Nor are they guaranteed lucrative post-political lobbying and speaking careers.

Focusing tax hikes on those who in some years make between $200,000 and $500,000 makes no sense in a recession for a variety of reasons. They are neither the speculators who caused the panic of 2008 nor the Washington politicians who are bankrupting the country.

Instead, most are small-business owners who hire the majority of the nation’s employees. But faced with the talk of higher taxes, more regulations, and hostile rhetoric, they will remain confused, and so retrench rather than expand.

With the proposed new income, payroll, and health-care tax rates, along with increased state and local taxes, many business owners fear that 60 percent to 70 percent of their income will go to the government. That does not seem a good way to convince small businesses to hire more workers in hopes of greater rewards.

Income is also not the only barometer of affluence. Two-hundred thousand dollars is quite a lot of annual money in Kansas, but does not always go so far in San Jose, where modest houses often cost well over half a million dollars. For those whose children do not qualify for need-based scholarships, a private liberal-arts education can easily set a parent back $200,000 per child over four years.

Why the war against the productive classes who want to be rich?

(continues below)


Maybe it is because they are not as numerous as the proverbial middle class. Perhaps they do not earn our empathy that is properly accorded to the poor. They surely lack the status and insider connections that accrue to the very rich.

Yet continue to punish and demonize them, and the country will grind to a halt — as we are seeing now.

by Victor Davis Hanson

This from National Review Online - December 24th, 2009

http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=ZmViZTdjMjgxM2JjZmU1NmUzODc4OGY2N2NiM2ZmZDc=

 
New data from the IRS shows a dramatic difference between the taxes paid by the merely rich and the ultra-rich.

A piece by Martin Sullivan on Tax.Com shows that those earning between $1 million to $1.5 million a year pay an effective tax rate of 24.1%. But those making more than $10 million a year pay 19.4%.

The reason, as Mr. Sullivan points out, is simple: “Most of the super rich receive their income in the form of capital gains. Capital gains and qualified dividends are taxed at 15 percent (instead of the top 35 percent rate that applies to other forms of income).”

What’s more, someone making more than $10 million in one year may be deriving that income from a one-time sale of a company or asset, which is also a capital gain.

I would add that the very rich are better able to create complex and expensive tax structures to reduce their tax rates.

The findings, however, show that our tax system is progressive — but only up to a point. In fact, Mr. Sullivan says “the U.S. tax system is in fact regressive at the high end,” since the ultra-rich pay a lower share than the merely rich.

by Robert Frank

Merely Rich are Paying More Taxes Than the Super-Rich

Read more at The Wall Street Journal - December 9th, 2009

http://blogs.wsj.com/wealth/2009/12/09/merely-rich-are-paying-more-taxes-than-the-super-rich/

• Kill the Bills. Do Health Reform Right. Sunday Paper - November 29th, 2009 The United States has the best health care in the world — but because of its inefficiencies, also the most expensive. The fundamental problem with the 2,074-page Senate health-care bill (as with its 2,014-page House counterpart) is that it wildly compounds the complexity by......
• Bank Bailout not Aboveboard WedNEWSday - December 24th, 2008 As taxpayers we had $700 billion of our money confiscated by the Federal government in what is now known as the Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP).   If you want to know how this impacts your pocketbook we just need to make some simple calculations.  According to the Tax......
• Speaker Pelosi's Job-Killing Agenda Sunday Paper - January 17th, 2010 After a three-week holiday break, the House of Representatives returned to session yesterday, and Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) marked the occasion with an op-ed detailing her “record of achievement” and outlining her agenda for the rest of the 111th Congress. Pelosi writes: “At the......
• We Now Work 7 1/2 Months to Cover Cost of Government Sunday Paper - August 16th, 2009 According to Americans for Tax Reform (ATR), Americans who pay federal income tax didn't earn one penny of their own money until August 13th.  In other words, nearly 7 1/2 months is the amount of time it took Americans to earn the total amount......
• The Obama Cabinet: Hope, Change, and Indiscretion Sunday Paper - January 18th, 2009 Barack Obama promised hope and change, however it appears that a parasitic, criminal element is already seeping into Washington.  It hasn't been smooth sailing for Obama and his footmen.  As Senate hearing confirmations unfold, the questionable character of several characters has come into question. We'll begin......

• Proof You can only Push High Net Worth and High Income Individuals So Far! One of my favorite sites, The Tax Foundation, had a phenomenal couple posts about Maryland’s so-called Millionaire Tax.  The two main posts are, Maryland’s Millionaires Missing After Tax Hike and Maryland’s Lawmaker Proposes making Millionaires’ Tax Permanent.  Maryland, like many other States out there are hurting for cash, so......
• Is Federal Income Tax Unconstitutional? All those people dutifully paying their income taxes are fools! In case you didn't know it, the federal income tax is unconstitutional and you don't have to pay a dime! At least that's what some people claim every year at this time. That's right, tax day is rapidly approaching and......
• My Last Income Tax Update (hopefully) I have given the readers of this blog an insight into my taxes, so I felt the need to give a conclusion to my income tax “situation” (yes, it has been upgraded to a situation).  These past updates include: Meeting my CPA Tomorrow – What should You Bring when Meeting......
• Why Doesn't Anyone Feel Remorse When it Comes to High Earners and Income Taxes? A bad ass blogger, Financial Samurai, made a comment on my blog today that really got to me.  His comment was in response to my post Listing Most of Obama’s Proposed Taxes.  Sam, as his random blogger buddies who live across the country call him, said, It’s one of......
• Year End Income Tax Guide (Part 2) This is the second part of Mr. ToughMoney Love's year end income tax guide that I have put together to help me (and I hope you) do some last minute strategizing and planning for the 2008 and 2009 tax years.  Most of these tips reflect matters that are new or changed in......