War Against the Wannabe Rich

Sunday Paper - December 27th, 2009

Why attack the productive classes who want to be rich?

There is class warfare going on in this country — but it’s not against the established rich. It’s against those who are trying to become wealthy.

President Obama has declared that those who make over $200,000 will pay higher income taxes. Caps on payroll taxes are supposed to come off as well for the upper class. Envisioned estate taxes will take 45 percent of individual inheritances valued over $3.5 million. Many states have also hiked their income taxes on the upper brackets.

Again, most of those targeted are not the already rich — a Warren Buffett or Bill Gates — but millions of the wannabe rich. They may have achieved larger-than-average annual incomes, but they’re not the multimillionaire speculators on Wall Street who nearly wrecked the American economy in search of huge bonuses and payoffs. Most are instead professionals and small-business owners who take enormous risks in hopes of being well-off and passing their wealth on to their children.

Oddly, much of the populist rhetoric about the need to gouge the newly affluent is voiced by the entrenched wealthy, who don’t have to care how high taxes go, given their own vast fortunes.

Take Bill Gates Sr., who is clamoring for higher estate taxes on inheritances. But such advocacy comes easy for him. After all, he is the father of the richest man in the world — someone who clearly needs no inheritance.

Billionaires also often set up charitable foundations to ensure their estates are channeled to their own preferences rather than simply given over to a needy U.S. Treasury. In contrast, moderately affluent business owners or farmers often leave enough property for their heirs to pay death taxes, but not enough to set up tax-exempt charitable foundations.

Warren Buffett also wants higher income taxes on the wealthy. He once confessed that thanks to all sorts of write-offs, he had paid only about 17 percent of his gross income in federal taxes, a lower rate than many employees in his office.

But Buffett, like Bill Gates Jr., is worth many billions of dollars. In truth, he has so much money that no amount of taxes would affect him much. A combined tax bite of 60 percent of his annual income would still leave Buffett each year with millions. Yet the same rate could cripple a business owner making $300,000 in annual income.

Often those in government claim that their tax-increase proposals are simply targeting the affluent like themselves — proof of their own selflessness. President Obama, for example, has complained that the well-off like himself could afford to pay more.

But unlike politicians in Washington, most upscale Americans in private enterprise do not receive free government perks and lavish pensions. Nor are they guaranteed lucrative post-political lobbying and speaking careers.

Focusing tax hikes on those who in some years make between $200,000 and $500,000 makes no sense in a recession for a variety of reasons. They are neither the speculators who caused the panic of 2008 nor the Washington politicians who are bankrupting the country.

Instead, most are small-business owners who hire the majority of the nation’s employees. But faced with the talk of higher taxes, more regulations, and hostile rhetoric, they will remain confused, and so retrench rather than expand.

With the proposed new income, payroll, and health-care tax rates, along with increased state and local taxes, many business owners fear that 60 percent to 70 percent of their income will go to the government. That does not seem a good way to convince small businesses to hire more workers in hopes of greater rewards.

Income is also not the only barometer of affluence. Two-hundred thousand dollars is quite a lot of annual money in Kansas, but does not always go so far in San Jose, where modest houses often cost well over half a million dollars. For those whose children do not qualify for need-based scholarships, a private liberal-arts education can easily set a parent back $200,000 per child over four years.

Why the war against the productive classes who want to be rich?

(continues below)


Maybe it is because they are not as numerous as the proverbial middle class. Perhaps they do not earn our empathy that is properly accorded to the poor. They surely lack the status and insider connections that accrue to the very rich.

Yet continue to punish and demonize them, and the country will grind to a halt — as we are seeing now.

by Victor Davis Hanson

This from National Review Online - December 24th, 2009

http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=ZmViZTdjMjgxM2JjZmU1NmUzODc4OGY2N2NiM2ZmZDc=

 
New data from the IRS shows a dramatic difference between the taxes paid by the merely rich and the ultra-rich.

A piece by Martin Sullivan on Tax.Com shows that those earning between $1 million to $1.5 million a year pay an effective tax rate of 24.1%. But those making more than $10 million a year pay 19.4%.

The reason, as Mr. Sullivan points out, is simple: “Most of the super rich receive their income in the form of capital gains. Capital gains and qualified dividends are taxed at 15 percent (instead of the top 35 percent rate that applies to other forms of income).”

What’s more, someone making more than $10 million in one year may be deriving that income from a one-time sale of a company or asset, which is also a capital gain.

I would add that the very rich are better able to create complex and expensive tax structures to reduce their tax rates.

The findings, however, show that our tax system is progressive — but only up to a point. In fact, Mr. Sullivan says “the U.S. tax system is in fact regressive at the high end,” since the ultra-rich pay a lower share than the merely rich.

by Robert Frank

Merely Rich are Paying More Taxes Than the Super-Rich

Read more at The Wall Street Journal - December 9th, 2009

http://blogs.wsj.com/wealth/2009/12/09/merely-rich-are-paying-more-taxes-than-the-super-rich/

• Tax Cheats Killefer and Daschle Withdraw WedNEWSday - February 4th, 2009 Perhaps liberals are in favor of high taxes because they don't pay them anyway.  Tim Geithner, new Secretary of Treasury is the only one of the three (that we are aware of) Obama tax-cheating cabinet nominees to survive.  Today Nancy Killefer, Obama's nominee for the......
• Speaker Pelosi's Job-Killing Agenda Sunday Paper - January 17th, 2010 After a three-week holiday break, the House of Representatives returned to session yesterday, and Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) marked the occasion with an op-ed detailing her “record of achievement” and outlining her agenda for the rest of the 111th Congress. Pelosi writes: “At the......
• The Tyranny of the Zero Liability Voter Special Edition - Thursday, June 25th, 2009 by Paul Smith There are an increasing number of Zero Liability Voters. These are voters who pay NO federal income tax. Any person who, when they fill out their income tax return, receives more money back than they paid into the system is......
• Miss California - American Voters Agree Sunday Paper - May 3rd, 2009 Sadly in America anyone who sees clearly and speaks his or her mind has to now be concerned with being labeled a bigot by the 'politically correct' culture propagated by the mainstream media.  Hats off to Carrie Prejean, Miss California, for standing up for her "Biblically......
• Paying For Your Neighbors' Indiscretions Sunday Paper - August 23rd, 2009 Both the House and Senate's version of the Democrats' health care proposals contain provisions preventing insurance companies from holding individuals accountable for their own behavior and consequently their health.  If the Democrats were to have their way, premiums could no longer be adjusted upwards......

• Tax Loss Harvesting To Reduce Income Taxes Recently I posted about capital gains and losses and the tax implications. Understanding how the IRS views short-term and long-term capital gains and losses is important for minimizing taxes. To minimize taxes on investment income it's important to know when a capital gain becomes a long-term gain instead of a......
• Are 50% Discounts Becoming Common In Florida? Looks like the housing market is bad in more than just Miami. I just got this email from a real estate agent based in Florida regarding a Short Sale. We have several sellers ready to walk away from their property without a penny. We have begun negotiations with the sellers......
• Money Mistake Monday - The I Applied For Too Many Credit Cards Syndrome. Photo by k9ine. There was a time when I think I had every credit card under the sun - reward cards, store branded cards, miles cards...you name it, I probably had it. And the scariest part of that was that I was a college student barely making $4.00 an hour......
• What Does Tax Money Pay For? This guest post comes from Michael, a contributing editor of the Dough Roller, a personal finance and investing blog, and Credit Card Offers IQ, a credit card review site.   I’m willing to bet that if you turned on CNBC, CNN or MSNBC right now, within 10 minutes you would......
• Sometimes Saving Hurts! Declining Interest Rates Shouldn't Lead to Rate Chasing This post was inspired by a post titled, “FNBO Direct Will Drop its Interest Rate to 1.9% APY, Considering SmartyPig with 3.25% APY?” on one of the Best Personal Finance Blogs out there, Consumerism Commentary. I always thought one of the smartest things the Wife and I did when......