War Against the Wannabe Rich

Sunday Paper - December 27th, 2009

Why attack the productive classes who want to be rich?

There is class warfare going on in this country — but it’s not against the established rich. It’s against those who are trying to become wealthy.

President Obama has declared that those who make over $200,000 will pay higher income taxes. Caps on payroll taxes are supposed to come off as well for the upper class. Envisioned estate taxes will take 45 percent of individual inheritances valued over $3.5 million. Many states have also hiked their income taxes on the upper brackets.

Again, most of those targeted are not the already rich — a Warren Buffett or Bill Gates — but millions of the wannabe rich. They may have achieved larger-than-average annual incomes, but they’re not the multimillionaire speculators on Wall Street who nearly wrecked the American economy in search of huge bonuses and payoffs. Most are instead professionals and small-business owners who take enormous risks in hopes of being well-off and passing their wealth on to their children.

Oddly, much of the populist rhetoric about the need to gouge the newly affluent is voiced by the entrenched wealthy, who don’t have to care how high taxes go, given their own vast fortunes.

Take Bill Gates Sr., who is clamoring for higher estate taxes on inheritances. But such advocacy comes easy for him. After all, he is the father of the richest man in the world — someone who clearly needs no inheritance.

Billionaires also often set up charitable foundations to ensure their estates are channeled to their own preferences rather than simply given over to a needy U.S. Treasury. In contrast, moderately affluent business owners or farmers often leave enough property for their heirs to pay death taxes, but not enough to set up tax-exempt charitable foundations.

Warren Buffett also wants higher income taxes on the wealthy. He once confessed that thanks to all sorts of write-offs, he had paid only about 17 percent of his gross income in federal taxes, a lower rate than many employees in his office.

But Buffett, like Bill Gates Jr., is worth many billions of dollars. In truth, he has so much money that no amount of taxes would affect him much. A combined tax bite of 60 percent of his annual income would still leave Buffett each year with millions. Yet the same rate could cripple a business owner making $300,000 in annual income.

Often those in government claim that their tax-increase proposals are simply targeting the affluent like themselves — proof of their own selflessness. President Obama, for example, has complained that the well-off like himself could afford to pay more.

But unlike politicians in Washington, most upscale Americans in private enterprise do not receive free government perks and lavish pensions. Nor are they guaranteed lucrative post-political lobbying and speaking careers.

Focusing tax hikes on those who in some years make between $200,000 and $500,000 makes no sense in a recession for a variety of reasons. They are neither the speculators who caused the panic of 2008 nor the Washington politicians who are bankrupting the country.

Instead, most are small-business owners who hire the majority of the nation’s employees. But faced with the talk of higher taxes, more regulations, and hostile rhetoric, they will remain confused, and so retrench rather than expand.

With the proposed new income, payroll, and health-care tax rates, along with increased state and local taxes, many business owners fear that 60 percent to 70 percent of their income will go to the government. That does not seem a good way to convince small businesses to hire more workers in hopes of greater rewards.

Income is also not the only barometer of affluence. Two-hundred thousand dollars is quite a lot of annual money in Kansas, but does not always go so far in San Jose, where modest houses often cost well over half a million dollars. For those whose children do not qualify for need-based scholarships, a private liberal-arts education can easily set a parent back $200,000 per child over four years.

Why the war against the productive classes who want to be rich?

(continues below)


Maybe it is because they are not as numerous as the proverbial middle class. Perhaps they do not earn our empathy that is properly accorded to the poor. They surely lack the status and insider connections that accrue to the very rich.

Yet continue to punish and demonize them, and the country will grind to a halt — as we are seeing now.

by Victor Davis Hanson

This from National Review Online - December 24th, 2009

http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=ZmViZTdjMjgxM2JjZmU1NmUzODc4OGY2N2NiM2ZmZDc=

 
New data from the IRS shows a dramatic difference between the taxes paid by the merely rich and the ultra-rich.

A piece by Martin Sullivan on Tax.Com shows that those earning between $1 million to $1.5 million a year pay an effective tax rate of 24.1%. But those making more than $10 million a year pay 19.4%.

The reason, as Mr. Sullivan points out, is simple: “Most of the super rich receive their income in the form of capital gains. Capital gains and qualified dividends are taxed at 15 percent (instead of the top 35 percent rate that applies to other forms of income).”

What’s more, someone making more than $10 million in one year may be deriving that income from a one-time sale of a company or asset, which is also a capital gain.

I would add that the very rich are better able to create complex and expensive tax structures to reduce their tax rates.

The findings, however, show that our tax system is progressive — but only up to a point. In fact, Mr. Sullivan says “the U.S. tax system is in fact regressive at the high end,” since the ultra-rich pay a lower share than the merely rich.

by Robert Frank

Merely Rich are Paying More Taxes Than the Super-Rich

Read more at The Wall Street Journal - December 9th, 2009

http://blogs.wsj.com/wealth/2009/12/09/merely-rich-are-paying-more-taxes-than-the-super-rich/

• Kill the Bills. Do Health Reform Right. Sunday Paper - November 29th, 2009 The United States has the best health care in the world — but because of its inefficiencies, also the most expensive. The fundamental problem with the 2,074-page Senate health-care bill (as with its 2,014-page House counterpart) is that it wildly compounds the complexity by......
• Tax Cheats Killefer and Daschle Withdraw WedNEWSday - February 4th, 2009 Perhaps liberals are in favor of high taxes because they don't pay them anyway.  Tim Geithner, new Secretary of Treasury is the only one of the three (that we are aware of) Obama tax-cheating cabinet nominees to survive.  Today Nancy Killefer, Obama's nominee for the......
• Speaker Pelosi's Job-Killing Agenda Sunday Paper - January 17th, 2010 After a three-week holiday break, the House of Representatives returned to session yesterday, and Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) marked the occasion with an op-ed detailing her “record of achievement” and outlining her agenda for the rest of the 111th Congress. Pelosi writes: “At the......
• UN and US 'Progressives' Planning One World Government Sunday Paper - May 31st, 2009 While meaningless United Nations hand-wringing over the North Korean nuclear weapons program garners the headlines, the world body is moving ahead with a global conference to lay the groundwork for world government financed by global taxes. U.N. General Assembly President Miguel D'Escoto (pictured above)......
• Selling Grass Grows Greener - Pass the Dutchie... WedNEWSday - July 22nd, 2009 More stoners equals more dependent on government.  Any word on whether medical 'dutchie' will be part of Obamacare?  As if there weren't enough 'layabouts' already on the dole courtesy of 'we the federal income taxpayers.' (continues below) After years in the shadows, medical marijuana in......

• How To Pay Off Your House In 3 Years! Previously, I had complained about the content in CNN's Money's Millionaires in the Making. Its always a rehash of rich people who're saving their extra money and are going to be rich.Well after some research I think I've found something thats a whole lot better - but it comes from......
• Real Estate and Taxes No one likes paying taxes, especially not real estate investors. Luckily, congress has been kind and offered a lot of tax breaks. Whenever you make a profit in real estate, there's usually a way to avoid or atleast defer paying taxes. The most well-known tax break is the 121 home......
• Weakonomics Tour of the Country:  Massachusetts (AKA the "Important Part of New England" State) The most patriotic of New England states is Massachusetts.  Famous for their tea parties and awful accents, this state is one of the most important to the country.  We would gladly give up some other states if we had to in order......
• Introduction to the IRA The IRA is an Individual Retirement Account that was originally created by the United States Congress as a means of providing retirement savings with tax advantages to workers that were not already being covered under an employer-sponsored retirement plan. Unlike the standard 401(k) plan, the purpose of an IRA is......
• 5 Dangerous Misconceptions People Have About Money. Few subjects are as distorted by myths, half-truths and falsehoods as money. While most people know enough to get through their lives, Mark Twain described much shoddy thinking about money when he famously said: "It ain't so much what we know that gets us into trouble. It's what we know......