Obama Needs to Focus on Real Enemies

This post was written by admin on March 4, 2009
Posted Under: Uncategorized

WedNEWSday - March 4th, 2009

ahmadinejad Obama Needs to Focus on Real Enemies

Barack Obama needs to worry less about socially re-engineering the United States of America via wealth redistribution and concern himself more with foreign affairs and our national security.  Instead of picking fights with Rush Limbaugh, how about taking a stand against Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.

The mainstream media has been enamored with Obama, admitting they feel “thrills” going up their leg.  Because of his youth and inexperience, and his young children at The White House, they quickly like to draw a comparison between Obama and JFK.  However, when we base the comparison on policies and principles, both foreign and domestic, Obama is more like LBJ.

NRO’s Mary Habeck writes:

LBJ inherited a series of foreign crises from his predecessor (Southeast Asia, of course, but also Cuba, the Cold War, and a worsening relationship with Europe), yet his entire personal interest was domestic policies. LBJ believed above all else in social justice, and his primary policy focus was the Great Society that he hoped to create through righting race relations, a war on poverty, and health care for all.

LBJ’s beliefs about American national interests led him to adopt the foreign policies of his predecessor, even keeping on JFK’s foreign policy team, and to seek to win the battles over his domestic policies, while being content to manage crises abroad through military and area experts. Throughout his tenure LBJ never lost his hatred for the conflict in Vietnam, calling it that “bitch of a war” because of the way it distracted him and the American people from the remaking of society, the only issue that truly mattered to him.

This pattern should sound familiar. Obama has not kept Bush’s foreign policy team, but he has retained key figures — including Secretary of Defense Gates and Afghanistan/Iraq war czar Lute — and he has adopted even the most controversial of his predecessor’s foreign policies. Even the mini “escalation” in Afghanistan seems eerily similar to LBJ’s escalations in 1964-5.

Yet Obama has been quick to appoint domestic policy czars who reflect his own beliefs in social justice and how to achieve it; quick to make detailed and well thought-out pronouncements on how his views of reshaping society differ from those of his predecessor; and quick to fight and win the domestic battles on the Hill while declining to even engage in a battle over the war on terror. All this suggests the same lack of personal interest in foreign matters combined with an overwhelming interest in domestic policy that dominated the LBJ White House.  

During his presidential campaign, Obama tagged Iran “a grave threat” and had Americans believing he wasn’t just talking tough when he said, “the world must prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon.”  But talking was about as tough as Obama wanted to get, being naive enough to think he would be able to sit down to negotiations and cajole Iran into skirting their nuclear ambitions.

The Wall Street Journal discusses the imminent danger Iran poses:

We’ve never held out much hope for those talks, which would inevitably be complicated and protracted. Mr. Obama is already trying to lure Russian help on Iran by offering to trade away hard-earned missile defense sites in Eastern Europe. Russia’s President claims to be unimpressed. And now it turns out that the rate at which Iran’s nuclear programs are advancing may render even negotiations moot.

Israeli Defense Minister Ehud Barak warned last week that “time is slipping through our fingers” when it comes to stopping Tehran. “What is needed,” he added, “is a two-pronged course of action which includes ironclad, strenuous sanctions . . . and a readiness to consider options in the event that these sanctions do not succeed.”

Nobody — Mr. Obama least of all — can doubt what Mr. Barak means by “options.” Nor should the Administration doubt that an Israeli strike, however necessary and justified, could put the U.S. in the middle of a broader Middle East war. If Mr. Obama wants to avoid a security crisis in the first year of his watch, he will have to get serious about Iran now.

This from The Wall Street Journal - March 4th, 2009

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123612623865424027.html

This from National Review Online - March 3rd, 2009

http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=YTc1MzRlZmUwYjUwZDgxZTgwNTJjM2Y0ODc1NTE2YmM=

Related Posts
  • major malik nadal hasan muslim islam allahu akbarObama and the Government-Media Complex Cover for Malik Nadal Hasan Sunday Paper - November 8th, 2009 We know now that Major Malik Nadal Hasan was a Muslim domestic terrorist who wreaked havok on Fort Hood, Texas. Discuss your feelings on this topic, and more broadly our President’s attention to domestic terrorism as we view a video report of the carnage.......
  • obama white house red house at war with fox newsThe Obama Red House - No Friend of Fox WedNEWSday - October 14th, 2009 White House Escalates War of Words with Fox News Calling Fox News "a wing of the Republican Party," the Obama administration on Sunday escalated its war of words against the channel, even as observers questioned the wisdom of a White House war on a news......
  • obama president pantywaist apology apologizes apologizing to the worldBad Guys Giving Obama the Bird Sunday Paper - June 7th, 2009 Insightful Telegraph.co.uk writer Gerald Warner sees a stark contrast in how the United States is being perceived on the world stage.  World leaders are breathing easier now that Bush and Cheney are gone and glad to see, in his words, 'President Pantywaist' in power.   Kim......
  • Obama Barack Rasmussen Reports Aproval Index drops dips below under zero negativeAmericans Awake: Obama Approval Plummets Below Zero Sunday Paper - July 12th, 2009 It is clear now why Obama was so eager to demonize the likes of Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity (along with any other dissenting voices).  The tactic is right from the pages of Saul Alinsky's Rules for Radicals.  10 days after Obama took office,......
  • obama senate blocks funds to close gitmo guantanamoSenate Blocks Funds for Obama to Close Gitmo WedNEWSday - May 20th, 2009 CRUSHING BLOW TO OBAMA The Senate voted on Wednesday to yank money for closing the Guantanamo Bay detention camp from a war spending bill, delivering a setback to President Obama in his efforts to shutter the prison by the start of 2010. By a vote of......
Related Websites
  • Alhaji Umaru Mutallab, Terrorist's FatherFailed Bomber Warns More to Follow [/caption] ABUJAH, Nigeria: Just three days after his arrest for his failed bomb attempt on the NWA flight to Detroit the terrorist has warned that others will follow. According to the Nigerian Compass News: Abdul Farouk Mutallab has declared that even if he is prosecuted and jailed, other trained terrorists would......
  • Emanuel and Ditherer-in-ChiefObama's Dithering Undermining US Troops WASHINGTON: It is now 72 days since the release of the McChrystal assessment dated August 30th. How long do we have to wait for Obama to answer McChrystal's request for more troops? Apparently longer. White House aides seem to be indignant that anyone is even interested: Angry at Monday’s CBS......
  • blog traffic exchangeConquering The Middle East We now have a new President, Barack Obama, and with this comes a new way to look at the Middle East. Many accuse the previous President, George W. Bush, of making empty promises when discussing the Middle East, since many argue his actions didn't always back up his words.......
  • financial newsBOE holds interest rates at 0.5 percent for another month. As had been widely predicted, the UK Monetary Policy Committee has chosen to hold interest rates at 0.5 percent as well as continuing with the existing programme of buying £175 billion of assets. The Bank of England will have to decide in November whether to continue expanding its programme......
  • blog traffic exchangeHard Truth Week in Review - Health Care Whining Edition Our local paper ran yet another article featuring the stories of those who do not have health care insurance. The reporter undercuts the merits of the story by including the whinings of this woman who says she can't afford health insurance. First, she quits her $85,000/year job and chooses not......

Add a Comment

required, use real name
required, will not be published
optional, your blog address